Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Chevrolet > Chevrolet Classics
Register FAQ Community Arcade Calendar
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-14-2010, 09:45 PM   #1
MetzO7
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Emporia, Kansas
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Question Mild 350 w 400 heads

I have a 350 bored .030 with flat top pistons, orginal torker intake and a edelbrock 600 cfm carb, and a cam not sure how big all I know is it has a nice lope, My question is I found a set of 400 heads cast num 3973493 with 2.02 and 1.60 valves the guy says they are 68 cc I am wanting to upgrade the stock heads to make some power but do not want to empty the wallet also don't want to worry about running 91 octane fuel due to 89 being the highest octane in the area, also worred about detonation with these heads since compression is raised with flat top pistons. Any help or suggestions are appreciated.
MetzO7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2010, 08:53 AM   #2
MrPbody
AF -Advisor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chesterfield, Virginia
Posts: 2,549
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Re: Mild 350 w 400 heads

Sorry I didn't see this sooner...

400 heads were all 76 CC chambers, as far as anything I've ever seen. The 493 IS listed as a 400 head, but I would guess it's been milled down for compression. The only REAL difference (from 350 stuff) I've ever noticed were the "steam holes" drilled in the 400s. We've drilled them in many a 350 head for use on 400.

The 2.02 intakes are not "original". The 1.6" exhaust MAY be (I've seen some that were, some that weren't). We see them a lot, where the intakes have been "upgraded" to 2.02. There is no such thing as an "original Torker" on a GM car. Edelbrock intakes are strictly "aftermarket". Or maybe you mean "Torker 1" as in the first design?

8.8-9.0:1 compression is as high as you "dare" for 89 octane. According to my calculations, staic compression with those heads will be right at 9.54:1. Too high, IMO, for anything lower than 93.

Jim
MrPbody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2010, 11:47 AM   #3
MetzO7
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Emporia, Kansas
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Mild 350 w 400 heads

Yes I knew the valves were not original, as to the intake I ment the Torker I, not the newer Torker II. Thanks for the help Jim
MetzO7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2010, 01:24 PM   #4
MrPbody
AF -Advisor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chesterfield, Virginia
Posts: 2,549
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Re: Mild 350 w 400 heads

No sweat!

Jim
MrPbody is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Chevrolet > Chevrolet Classics


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:21 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts