Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Engineering/Technical Ask technical questions about cars. Do you know how a car engine works? |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
04-14-2015, 10:36 PM | #1 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: River Falls, Wisconsin
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Best Engines ever and why - Discussion
This is something I have wanted to do for a while.
This thread is to discuss engine design and what made some of the great engines so good. The Formula longevity x (HP / CID) / engine size x 100 = Rating and explain why including highlights and hindrances of the particular engine. Engine sizes Gy6 49cc scooter engine 10 Metro 1.0 I3 9 Volkswagen 2.0 I4 8 Volvo 2.4 I5 7 Honda 3.2 v6 6 Chevy 4.3 V6 5 Ford 302 V8 4 Mopar 360 V8 3 Chevy 454 V8 2 Wärtsilä-Sulzer RTA96-C 1 Longevity 10,000 miles for sure 1 100,000 miles 2 200,000 miles maybe 3 250,000 miles probably 4 300,000 miles perhaps 5 Lets see how this goes. |
|
04-14-2015, 10:41 PM | #2 | |
AF Newbie
Thread starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: River Falls, Wisconsin
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Best Engines ever and why - Discussion
So lets try this and see what I get.. I'll do a 1968 Ford 302 4V
A strong engine that made decent power, especially for it's small overall size. Ok... Longevity 2 x 350/302 (1.158) \ 4 x 100 = 57.9 The good power and sound were great, Front timing cover sucked, and it's hard to find decent heads for them. Almost all stock 302's came with wimpy heads. |
|
04-15-2015, 01:47 PM | #3 | |
SHO No Mo
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Posts: 10,978
Thanks: 103
Thanked 354 Times in 347 Posts
|
Re: Best Engines ever and why - Discussion
I don't understand what your "formula" is trying to accomplish. The longevity variable is subjective and the engine sizes variable appears to be brand specific.
-Rod |
|
04-15-2015, 08:23 PM | #4 | |
AF Newbie
Thread starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: River Falls, Wisconsin
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Best Engines ever and why - Discussion
Oh come on! Brand specific? No. Brands represent a company who hire people skilled at designing engines. People are people, brands be damned. Anyone can design a gem or a bomb. Which do you think is best, and why?
|
|
04-15-2015, 08:36 PM | #5 | ||
AF Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Anywhere, Washington
Posts: 398
Thanks: 0
Thanked 36 Times in 33 Posts
|
Re: Best Engines ever and why - Discussion
Quote:
Twisted Wedge or AFR heads--what's the problem? The upper limit to the later stock roller cam 5.0 block is when the main bearing webs start to fall out at about 500 HP. For small engine compartments the Ford is hard to beat. It's a bit long 'tho. Have a bigger compartment and I'd go for an LS Chevy-- more cubes potential and you can get some of them in aluminum. If I had a project that demanded a "high tech" engine, I'd probably pick one of the Ford 5.0 cammer motors. Forget about European or japanese motors. Not enough value for the money. |
||
04-15-2015, 09:05 PM | #6 | |
AF Newbie
Thread starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: River Falls, Wisconsin
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Best Engines ever and why - Discussion
I do like the LS's. And I concur with the SB ford being way too long, especially in the nose. What do you think about the GT-40 and GT-40p heads? They were stock heads at least. Aftermarket is kinda like cheating, you know?
|
|
04-15-2015, 11:09 PM | #7 | |
SHO No Mo
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Posts: 10,978
Thanks: 103
Thanked 354 Times in 347 Posts
|
Re: Best Engines ever and why - Discussion
Forgive the engineer in me for being hung up on the formula. But for the formula you list: Engine sizes Gy6 49cc scooter engine 10 Metro 1.0 I3 9 Volkswagen 2.0 I4 8 Volvo 2.4 I5 7 Honda 3.2 v6 6 Chevy 4.3 V6 5 Ford 302 V8 4 Mopar 360 V8 3 Chevy 454 V8 2 Wärtsilä-Sulzer RTA96-C 1 Each of those engines has a brand name in front of them, hence my comment regarding "brand specific." So if I wanted to chose a Ford 3.2L V6, your list of engines does not allow that. -Rod
|
|
04-16-2015, 06:22 AM | #8 | |
AF Newbie
Thread starter
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: River Falls, Wisconsin
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Best Engines ever and why - Discussion
Those are just examples for overall engine size.
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|