![]() |
![]() |
Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
![]() | ![]() | ||
![]() | ![]() |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Performance Discuss Engine, Suspension, Drivetrain, and all other performance modifications here. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#31 | ||
AF Enthusiast
![]() |
Re: Re: 4.3L Upgrade Questions
Quote:
__________________
2002 Pontiac Gram Am K&N Air Filter Mobil1 5W-30 Extended 15K 2 JL Audio 12" Subs Sealed JL Audio Box Coustic 400 Watt Class D Mono Amp Pioneer Head Unit 50X4 MP3, WMA, AAC Super Tuner Polk DB750 6.5" all around Yankees Suck!!!!!!!! |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#32 | ||
AF Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 4.3L Upgrade Questions
I've seen this pop up on many a performance board and you might be able to do these in a different order as you can with many other vehicles.
First point though: BlazerLT - I've seen a lot of your posts and you are a smart individual on many subject so I don't want to step on your toes on this. Nothing but respect here. There is a possible order change here though as I haven't seen any scientific data on other posts so far... It might have been covered but I haven't seen it. It might be best to do: Intake, Chip, Muffler. As everyone knows, the engine is nothing but an overglorified air pump. We need to find where the restrictions are to improve it. Does anyone have any dyno results on what happens when you pull the exhaust off, or the intake seperately? It has been found out on my 2004 Monte Carlo, that the exhaust doesn't really need to be changed until you hit generate more than 300 HP as it isn't that big of a restriction... the restriction is getting air into the engine. This is also on the 3.8 and 3.8 Supercharged version which is a dynamically different engine. Does anyone know the volume of exhaust that goes out the stock mufflers compared to when you run strait pipe? Also if you pull the air box off and run stock mufflers if it changes in case the intake is choking the engine? If we don't know these numbers, you always have to start with the intake then exhaust, then chip. If the stock exhuast is great, then you can change the chip as in the case of the Monte Carlo. Another way of looking at it is air pump example. 1 inch intake tube to pump to 3 inch outgoing tube... doesn't make sense. Flip them around and you still draw the same as the air is not being forced into the engine, it's being sucked by the downward stroke of the piston. The best we can do is make sure the intake is good first, then worry about what is being squirted out the back. Especially if you go the low cost (which I don't recommend) method of cheap parts - Ebay intake $30, exhaust $120. Hope this helps people. Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#33 | ||
AF Regular
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: blank
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 4.3L Upgrade Questions
Quote:
Mathmatically(simplified) PRESSURE multiplied by VOLUME = POWER. If volume is constant , but pressure increases, power(loss) increases. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#34 | |
AF -Advisor
![]() Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sudbury
Posts: 13,565
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: 4.3L Upgrade Questions
04 Intimidator,
Thanks for your input. The thing is, there is not as much restriction in the short intake when compared to the 6 or so feet of exhaust running out to the rear of the truck. Add in the fact that the huge stock muffler is a huge restriction and you get an overall bottleneck happening more in the exhaust that you will ever see in the intake. There is no point in upgrading anything on the engine whether intake or chip until you have gone after the biggest power reducing in the 4.3L's path.
__________________
1995 Factory Blazer Service Manual for sale, PM if interested. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#35 | ||
AF Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 4.3L Upgrade Questions
Quote:
I'm also going to assume the BlazerLT knows from life experiance that the muffler is the bottle neck. Like I said looking at his previous posts in other topics I can trust him. In this case and the engine will gain HP by simply removing what is wasted by the piston trying to push the exhaust out. BlazerLT - I don't want to word this in a negative way as it's not my intent. Do you happen to have some numbers on how much HP is gained by just removing the exhaust and running straight pipe? |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#36 | |
AF Regular
![]() |
Re: 4.3L Upgrade Questions
I am in process of trying to do some power mods to mine. I found the ECU programmer on e-bay for $100 so I got it, needless to say I have done ECU first, nice because it gives you the ability to return to stock with just a plug and 5 mins. i was going to try the intake first because of the $$ involved in the exhaust. However you all have brought up a good point obout the exhaust being done first. Do you think incrasing the size to 3inch from the cat back is enough? Would you not still have restriction in the manifolds and upto the cat?
__________________
I love these trucks !! I have had an 84 and 89 Pickup X-cab P/U also assorted 2 Dr Blazers. I now own a 97 4 Dr. I love these trucks !! Still a work in progress but ... http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/761008 ![]() Macgyver Ontario, Canada |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#37 | |
GM S-Series Mod
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Westminster, Maryland
Posts: 2,650
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: 4.3L Upgrade Questions
2.5 inch is as big as u wanna go with the exhaust. any bigger and you will lose power.
__________________
2000 Chevy Blazer ZR2 Performance Mods: Numerous Suspension Mods: Some, but not enough Exterior Mods: Just Right 1987 Buick Turbo T Dark Red Low 11 sec sleeper ![]() .030 4.1 block, PT6262E, & other odds and ends.... My Cardomain |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#38 | |
AF Newbie
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: trillville, Minnesota
Posts: 52
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 4.3L Upgrade Questions
The best and most efficient upgrade, somewhat affordable is called an LS1. But yes, it's called a scavaging effect, you want a certian amount of back pressure.
1. Cold air intake 2. Cat-back exhaust 3. Headers 4. Chip 5. TB Spacer 6. Thermost before i upgraded to an LS1, i had an 00 4.3 vortec, .030 bore, forged pistons, stock crank, comp cam, 1.7 rockers, Stock ported heads, 5 angle valve job, fitted with oversized valves, 160* thermo, Headers, Catback exhaust, upgraded computer, corvette radiator. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#39 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: hamilton, Ohio
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 4.3L Upgrade Questions
ive been wanting to build a 250 inline so bad for my s-blazer seems like the tbi is an easy swap to the inline plus inlines are soo hard to hurt. any previous experience would be helpful though ill update as i make progress. right now just bolted holley tbi on my stocker ill update after i put it through its paces
__________________
91 blazer 4.3 holley tbi 31's mostly stock but runs beautiful have flowmaster in plans |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#40 | |
GM S-Series Mod
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Westminster, Maryland
Posts: 2,650
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: 4.3L Upgrade Questions
thread is over 2 years old. your question does not relate to the topic so feel free to make a new thread about the 250.
__________________
2000 Chevy Blazer ZR2 Performance Mods: Numerous Suspension Mods: Some, but not enough Exterior Mods: Just Right 1987 Buick Turbo T Dark Red Low 11 sec sleeper ![]() .030 4.1 block, PT6262E, & other odds and ends.... My Cardomain |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|