Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Ford > Windstar
Register FAQ Community Arcade Calendar
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-25-2005, 02:45 PM   #31
DRW1000
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,422
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Re: Re: Codes 171 & 174 TSB # 03-16-1 update

Quote:
Originally Posted by 12Ounce
I don't remember "blue". And I remember rubber o-rings...not exactly circular... but with "ribs", not "texture".
But they may have been up-graded since I bought mine.
"Ribs" does sound like a better description. They are thicker than I would have expected too.
DRW1000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2005, 08:19 PM   #32
pcitizen
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hampton, Virginia
Posts: 79
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Send a message via MSN to pcitizen
Re: Codes 171 & 174 TSB # 03-16-1 update

The seals are baby blue with a very slight ribbing that is molded perpendicular to the seal's length. The aren't round and are nothing like an o-ring or gasket.
pcitizen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2005, 07:36 PM   #33
DRW1000
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,422
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Re: Re: Codes 171 & 174 TSB # 03-16-1 update

Quote:
Originally Posted by pcitizen
The seals are baby blue with a very slight ribbing that is molded perpendicular to the seal's length. The aren't round and are nothing like an o-ring or gasket.

Wow this thread will never end.........

Okay I bought the seals and the bolts (I have had the problem about 6 months now) and I am waiting for a nice day. This weekend it should be about 10 degress C in Toronto so I am starting to get prepared. I was reading the excellent post that someone did with the whole step by step procedure.

My question though:

From reading the step by step it seems like one really does need to remove the cowling to get the upper off. I think the author stated something like the upper intake is 1/2 inch too high or the cowling is 1/2 inch too low.

Does the cowling need to be removed? Should it be removed? Anyone who has done this repair should have a valuable opinion. I am also planning on replacing the spark plugs. Are there any benefits using the Motorcraft over the autolites?

Thanks
DRW1000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2005, 07:48 PM   #34
pcitizen
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hampton, Virginia
Posts: 79
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Send a message via MSN to pcitizen
Re: Codes 171 & 174 TSB # 03-16-1 update

After doing the job and posting the web site to which you reference I recommend (now) removing the cowling. Though I didn't do this myself, I believe it would have made for a single person job.

BTW: Thanks for the comps.

PCitizen
pcitizen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2005, 08:53 PM   #35
DRW1000
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,422
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Re: Re: Codes 171 & 174 TSB # 03-16-1 update

Quote:
Originally Posted by pcitizen
After doing the job and posting the web site to which you reference I recommend (now) removing the cowling. Though I didn't do this myself, I believe it would have made for a single person job.

BTW: Thanks for the comps.

PCitizen
Ah the author.......................

I did not offer enough compliments. It is fantastic, well written and very informative. I wish you wrote repair manuals for a living.

I feel like I have practically done the work without yet turning a wrench.
DRW1000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2005, 08:58 PM   #36
12Ounce
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 4,088
Thanks: 21
Thanked 152 Times in 148 Posts
Re: Codes 171 & 174 TSB # 03-16-1 update

When you remove the cowling (the second time), it will take you about 15 minutes MAX! The first time, you're investing a bit more time for the learning process.

I wouldn't even consider filling the brake reservoir without removing the cowling.
12Ounce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2005, 10:18 PM   #37
wiswind
AF Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 3,639
Thanks: 0
Thanked 116 Times in 92 Posts
Re: Codes 171 & 174 TSB # 03-16-1 update

DRW1000, mentioned Motorcraft or Autolite spark plugs, I have not used the Autolite.....so I cannot comment. The only thing that I will comment is to make sure that you get the DOUBLE PLATINUM plugs, which both Motorcraft and Autolite offer....so I would guess you would be fine with either one (Both used to be made by the same company).

Don't do this, the GROUND prong will wear on one side of the motor...

Do this, and they will be good for another 100K miles.

This thread may be long, but is one of the most important on the Windstar forum.....for owners of '99 and newer.
Great information....and pics on that link.
wiswind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2005, 07:57 PM   #38
DRW1000
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,422
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Re: Codes 171 & 174 TSB # 03-16-1 update

Well we may as well have this thread complete if it is going to be around forever.

Does anyone know the torque for the following:

1)Spark Plugs - (7-15 Ft-lbs)
2)Isolator bolts - (89 in-lbs)
3)the bolts holding the two alves of the upper intake together - (89 in-lbs)

The above are what I think my Haynes suggests. Does anyone agree or disagree or has a different sources?

Thanks.
DRW1000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2005, 08:27 PM   #39
pcitizen
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hampton, Virginia
Posts: 79
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Send a message via MSN to pcitizen
Re: Codes 171 & 174 TSB # 03-16-1 update

About those torque specs... the ones for the isolator bolts and intake sound right on. As for the spark plugs... well... I've been working on cars since 1973. I have never torqued them with a torque wrench. Just made them good n snug. Over all this time, I've only had one unscrew itself. Agreed... torquing to specs is the best practice. The measurement you provided seems about right.

BTW: 89 in. lbs. is about 7 ft lbs. Only difference between the two (in. to ft.) is precision.

PCitizen
pcitizen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2005, 08:41 PM   #40
DRW1000
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,422
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Re: Re: Codes 171 & 174 TSB # 03-16-1 update

Quote:
Originally Posted by pcitizen
About those torque specs... the ones for the isolator bolts and intake sound right on. As for the spark plugs... well... I've been working on cars since 1973. I have never torqued them with a torque wrench. Just made them good n snug. Over all this time, I've only had one unscrew itself. Agreed... torquing to specs is the best practice. The measurement you provided seems about right.

BTW: 89 in. lbs. is about 7 ft lbs. Only difference between the two (in. to ft.) is precision.

PCitizen

I guess I am not quite as old (lol) but I have been working on cars since about 1978 and I never used a torque wrench on spark plugs either. I just figured it was time I started. I never used to use a torque wrench on wheels either but I have since seen the light.

Thanks for the reply
DRW1000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2005, 08:44 PM   #41
pcitizen
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hampton, Virginia
Posts: 79
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Send a message via MSN to pcitizen
Re: Codes 171 & 174 TSB # 03-16-1 update

Wheels. Yes... it's a must there or distortion of the disks will occur. Old... perhaps in reference to the young and young in reference to the older.
pcitizen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2005, 08:48 PM   #42
pupuputz
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Blaine, Washington
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Codes 171 & 174 TSB # 03-16-1 update

I did this TSB today and it took me about 4 hours. It wasn't nearly as hard as I thought it would be. I would like to thank pcitizen for all his efforts, they really helped out. If you weren't on the other side of the country I'd buy you a beer. My Windstar has 100,000kms and I didn't have any fault codes coming up but I did have the knocking sound. It would quiten somewhat when I pressed on the intake manifold. When I was at the Ford dealership getting the parts, they said they had done 3 with the same problem that day! I didn't replace my upper intake halves seal. The Ford dealer said I could probably get away without replacing it if my old one looked okay. Does anyone know why you have to replace the valve cover? Can you get away without replacing it? They didn't have one in stock so I haven't replaced it yet. From what I understand, oil will get into the intake manifold by the small hole in the valve cover. The oil then wrecks the isolator bolts. Will the new isolator bolts be able to withstand oil? If so, I should be able to keep my original valve cover. I'm thinking that Ford may have included the valve cover to be over precautious. Please feel free to put in your two bits because I have limited knowledge about this stuff. I would rather not spend the $130 that they quoted me for one. BTW my isolator bolts, port seals, and vacuum line cost $113 CDN.
pupuputz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2005, 09:03 PM   #43
wiswind
AF Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 3,639
Thanks: 0
Thanked 116 Times in 92 Posts
Re: Codes 171 & 174 TSB # 03-16-1 update

If your windstar is a '99 or 00, you may want to get the valve cover.... If it is newer than that.....you already have the improved type.
The main concern that I would have with excessive oil being drawn in.....is carbon build-up in the cylinders.....

You might try shopping around by checking dealerships through www.parts.com
You will need to find a dealership that will ship to Canada. Other choice might be to see if you can get one through a junk yard.
wiswind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2005, 07:16 AM   #44
DRW1000
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,422
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Re: Re: Codes 171 & 174 TSB # 03-16-1 update

Quote:
Originally Posted by pcitizen
Wheels. Yes... it's a must there or distortion of the disks will occur. Old... perhaps in reference to the young and young in reference to the older.
PCitizen................I didn't mean to call you old...............Just a couple of years on me.

Sorry if it may have offended you.
DRW1000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2005, 08:35 AM   #45
DRW1000
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,422
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Re: Re: Codes 171 & 174 TSB # 03-16-1 update

Quote:
Originally Posted by pupuputz
I did this TSB today and it took me about 4 hours. It wasn't nearly as hard as I thought it would be. I would like to thank pcitizen for all his efforts, they really helped out. If you weren't on the other side of the country I'd buy you a beer. My Windstar has 100,000kms and I didn't have any fault codes coming up but I did have the knocking sound. It would quiten somewhat when I pressed on the intake manifold. When I was at the Ford dealership getting the parts, they said they had done 3 with the same problem that day! I didn't replace my upper intake halves seal. The Ford dealer said I could probably get away without replacing it if my old one looked okay. Does anyone know why you have to replace the valve cover? Can you get away without replacing it? They didn't have one in stock so I haven't replaced it yet. From what I understand, oil will get into the intake manifold by the small hole in the valve cover. The oil then wrecks the isolator bolts. Will the new isolator bolts be able to withstand oil? If so, I should be able to keep my original valve cover. I'm thinking that Ford may have included the valve cover to be over precautious. Please feel free to put in your two bits because I have limited knowledge about this stuff. I would rather not spend the $130 that they quoted me for one. BTW my isolator bolts, port seals, and vacuum line cost $113 CDN.
Yeah I had the same reservation in regards to the $130 CDN they quoted me. I have read people purchasing it for under $50 US. Even with the exchange Ford of Canada is charging too much.

I seriously doubt that the hole makes that much of a difference (IMHO). I think it is just a great way to sell more parts for what can only be described as a design defect. I was thinking of simply blocking the hole with a nut, bolt, cotter pin (or similar guarantee locking device) and a piece of gasket material. I could probably do this for about $1.00. I can do this anytime so for now just the bolts, seals, and plugs.
DRW1000 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Ford > Windstar


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:59 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts