Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
View Poll Results: Which is the best sports car? | |||
Porsche Boxster | 3 | 15.79% | |
BMW Z4 | 5 | 26.32% | |
Honda S2000 | 7 | 36.84% | |
'New' Mercedes-Benz SLK | 4 | 21.05% | |
Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
07-25-2004, 10:31 PM | #16 | ||
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: miami, Florida
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: SLK, Boxster, S2000, or Z4
Quote:
In my opinion, the japanese car market, and companies like honda, do not need to spend more money on dropping V-8's into their cars, i mean, if honda can squeeze 240 hp out of a N/A 2.0l 4 banger, what do you think they can do with a v-6 3.5 liter? There really isnt a need for a v-8 for japs, they focus more on efficiency rather than displacement or cylinders for that matter, they should stick to 4's and 6's.
__________________
|
||
07-25-2004, 10:50 PM | #17 | |
Here for the pussy, man.
|
Re: SLK, Boxster, S2000, or Z4
S2000's are only good if you cane them, they are unresponsive to modification and less practical than the other four and the chassis is too snappy.
The Z4 has better brakes than the S2000, better handling, much better interior and a superb engine (Biased ) The new SLK looks awesome, but I'm yet to drive one- but the fact that the recirculating ball steering is gone is very encouraging. The Boxster is my pick though, it's the fastest of the four, has it's engine in the right place, has what is easily my favourite interior, offers superb trackability and is as practical as a roadster comes- it's VERY hard to fault the Boxster S.
__________________
Check out my Pride and joy in AF- and discuss your favourite Alfa Romeo 2007 Audi A4 3.0 TDI Le Mans |
|
07-26-2004, 09:01 AM | #18 | |
Banned
|
Re: SLK, Boxster, S2000, or Z4
S2K in the real world.... cheap (compared to others), lightweight, good HP/Kg ratio, good handling, good looks, reliable, fun to start ur car with a red button, cool digital gauges, the best honda after the NSX. . .let downs: low end torque or lack therof.... soft top (less rigidity worse aero) but can be replaced with hardtop easily fixes aero and slightly stiffens car, 2 seater
|
|
07-26-2004, 09:06 AM | #19 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cheltnam
Posts: 320
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: SLK, Boxster, S2000, or Z4
Quote:
Bare in mind that the Boxster (launched hear in late '96) has been around for 8 years now, relativley un-changed. The S2000 is slower, but only marginally, and you must realise that we are comparing the fastest Boxster, the S, with a price tag of nealy £40k, to a £25k Honda. I do appreciate that the Boxster handles like a dream, but the merc, much to my surprise, handles better. I really want to see the new Boxster in action. The current one is geriatric in this company... |
||
07-26-2004, 06:19 PM | #20 | ||
Here for the pussy, man.
|
Re: Re: Re: SLK, Boxster, S2000, or Z4
Quote:
__________________
Check out my Pride and joy in AF- and discuss your favourite Alfa Romeo 2007 Audi A4 3.0 TDI Le Mans |
||
08-23-2004, 12:11 AM | #21 | |
Yaya Master
|
Re: SLK, Boxster, S2000, or Z4
Guys this is a month old thread please don't vote anymore or post in old threads. You can read the car comparo guidelines at the top of the page.
__________________
(\__/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination |
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|