Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Racing Discuss racing, share kill stories, provide track info, etc. |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
07-26-2004, 09:47 PM | #16 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: Supra vs Skyline
From what I seen and know the Supra would win. At first its gonna look like the Skyline will win, but later on the Supra would catch up and spank it. The Skyline is heavy, and so is the Supra, but the Skyline weighs even more. The Skyline isnt using its AWD on the race (exept for launch) so the extra pounds is gonna be a waste. This is in a straight line, like in the 1/4 or on the freeway. The Skyline would rtake the Supra on a track though, but thats because of better handling and the ATTESSA ETS PRO. When modded Supras can make CRAZY numbers, and so can Skylines, but usually I see the Supras making higher numbers. I've seen way more Supras beat Skylines on vids. I'm very suprised not everybody said the Skyline woulld win. Whenever I say a Supra can beat the Skyline in the straight people cant handle the fact that the very overhyped and bastardised Skyline isnt the car to end all cars.
__________________
|
|
07-29-2004, 10:45 PM | #17 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Owings Mills, Maryland
Posts: 238
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Now I MAY be over-looking something here...but why in the hell are Skylines putting Supra engines in and vica-versa?!?!?! What does one side think the other engine is faster/more capable, and the other thinks the same?? I think that is complete ass-nine, and someone PLEASE explain. If you like the Skyline engine, get a skyline. Like Spras engine, getta supra!
|
|
07-31-2004, 07:57 PM | #18 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: Supra vs Skyline
When people do engine swaps like then it may be for a number of reasons. Maybe they like, the RB26DETT engine, but like the Supra looks better. Or maybe they want attention like Top Secret. Who knows. I like the power of Supra engines, cause once those cars go, they are GONE. And from what I know the 2JZ-GTE engines are easier modded. But suspension, and computers wise, the Skyline is more advanced. Put it like this. The Skyline is more of a track car, and Supra is more of a drag or top speed car.
__________________
|
|
08-07-2004, 04:42 AM | #19 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: claremont, California
Posts: 42
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Supra vs Skyline
stock for stock a 94 vspecii will spank a mkiv tt 6spd. weighs in at a little over 3100 . and lately ive seen them run very very low(like practically flat) 13's stock at tracks(including stock tires).
|
|
09-03-2004, 06:22 PM | #20 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 519
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Supra vs Skyline
but what if it wasn't a gt-r just a gts thats FR too and it has a rb25det
|
|
09-22-2004, 10:39 PM | #21 | ||
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NY, New York
Posts: 5,596
Thanks: 3
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
Re: Re: Supra vs Skyline
Depends children...
Hks r33 GTR hmm fastest skyline to date I think runs low 8's an possiblys sevens. Power u guys want veilside duh. Street drag bnr34 ran 1668 hp! on the dyno How ever they re veilside supra is fast as well but the rb's are still my fave ask for the future as I so heard from V quicky the Vq (skyline engine for all you supra enthusiasts) has a supposed maxd compasityof 1500 hp. So supra people have fun tryn to match best supra to date have to say JUN.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
10-10-2004, 01:17 PM | #22 | ||
AF Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: claremont, California
Posts: 42
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Supra vs Skyline
Quote:
|
||
12-20-2004, 04:10 AM | #23 | |
AF Fanatic
|
How about a GTR with this engine?
In this car? This car should weigh about 2900 with me in it. The engine will put out clost to 700/700 at 6500rpms. My ony limiting factor is the suspension, that is why I am here. What mods do the Supras do to get them to launch?
__________________
R32 GTR w/351w .020 forged, 8.9:1, PTK T76, Turbosmart 40 BC & 45 WG, Tial 40 BV, AFR 205s 310/245, 228/228 550/550 114 Hydro, 1.7rr, Isky RLs, 4" HKS exhaust, ARC 30x16x4 IC, 8 point cage, C2 gauges, 2 step, C4 3200 stall w/ R Manual & Hurst Ratchet shifter, 17" Panasport G7s, CSU 750 & bonnet, Vic Jr intake, 3.63 gears, Corbeau Carrera seats, Custom wide body, Bomex side skirts and rear 1/4 caps, Tommy Kaira bumper. |
|
09-09-2005, 09:54 AM | #24 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Skyline freaks are to arrogant
Hate to burst your bubble guys but the fastest full weight street legal supra is faster then the fastest full weight street legal gtr. I see all you guys talking about AWD WILL HELP IT WIN IN A STRAIGHT LINE. At high power levels this is not true. If anything it'd give the car a disadvantage. As for power figures 1600 is an average "HUGE HORSEPOWER" supra. Marko in the states is making something like 2100Hp. Round a track its also pretty even but gtrs definetly have the edge. The fastest supra in the world does not have a rb26 in it. People do engine swaps because they get bored following trends. Top secret swapped their supra to a rb26 because the 2jz was reknowned for its huge torque, which they complain was shredding their tyres *shrugs*. In 98 i think it was they had a 3sgte in their supra *shrugs again*. So the answer, 1/4mile or highway a supra will blow the doors off a gtr. On the track id give the win to the skyline, although it can be VERY close with the right suspension setup on your soop
|
|
02-09-2007, 02:36 PM | #25 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Supra vs Skyline
I like both don't know what to say but i definately preffer the Supra.
__________________
http://toyotamkivsupra.blogspot.com/ |
|
04-05-2007, 01:11 PM | #26 | ||
AF Regular
|
Re: Skyline freaks are to arrogant
Quote:
__________________
It's All About The FINNESSe! X 1993 MR2 Turbo X New Project - 1997 Toyota Supra TT Limited Edition. |
||
04-24-2007, 10:54 PM | #27 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: georgetown, Texas
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Supra vs Skyline
The skyline not being sold here really helped show what the supra can do.
Put some usa supra tt against jdm gtrs in the 1/4 supra almost ever time
__________________
|
|
01-29-2009, 11:52 PM | #28 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Supra vs Skyline
It's hard to compare two cars that were never meant to be compared. They're completely different from one another. One has an all wheel drive set up, that is if it's a gtr, and a 2.6l twin turbo. The other is rwd and has a 3.0l twin turbo. That's almost half a litre difference. Either one can be faster than the other depending on the car's weight, wheel horsepower, and the driver. i don't believe one car can ever be "fully modded". Then what is the race? Top end? 1/8 mi? 1/4mi? Race course? I think the best comparison could be made between an R33 series 2 gts with an RB26DETT swap and a MKIV Supra with a 1JZ-GTTE. Although the GTS Skyline never came stock with an RB26 and a MKIV never came stock with a 1JZ. Almost direct comparison though: Both rear wheel drive with lsd, roughly same weight, series 2 r33 came around in 1996-1999, around the last days of the US having the Supra, and finally the skyline having a 2.6L TT and the Supra with a 2.5L TT. Point 1 L difference is much better than .4. Although the Series two came with a 2.5L stock on most occasions(rarely a 2.0 inline 6), it's a single turbo. So from a dig to the top end, completely stock, supra would most likely jump the line, skyline would lead up to around 120 or, and then the Supra would take top end.
|
|
10-01-2010, 02:49 AM | #29 | |
AF Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Fremont, California
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Supra vs Skyline
first of all, the purpose of the skyline was to mash your brain through the corners. It was made as a car that can turn well and set lap times. The supra wasnt. I have nothing against the supra, but compared to the skyline its no competition. yea it might go faster in a straight line but once the bends come it will be passed for good. and its not that hard to make a car fast on a straight line if you have the money, hell, you can make a pick up run ridiculously fast times on the quarter. to me the cars are in a different league, the skyline is made for the hardcore, while the supra was made for, well going in a straight line i guess. The supra is one of those cars that is on its own, the skylines and nsx's are in the business of cornering and lap performance while another maybe close competitor the 300zx or vr-4 are in a separate category because they are way cheaper and dont really compare to a supra that much( however a 300zx TT modded with some love can spank any car out there). there is no real comparison between the supra and skyline because they were made to do different thing.
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|