...liberal proffesor

okay this is really pissing me off. Im sitting in class, American History. And my proffesor is a bleeding heart liberal. WHAT THE HELL! Okay i want to learn about america history but not when every other fucking word is stained with the thoughts of a liberal. I really dont think this lady can say anything straight forward she is so much worse then the media. and they are bad. i mean honestly she says that we gave weapons of "mass destrucion" to Iraq. and of course the class is like *gasp* oh noes. but what she fails to say is WHY we gave WEAPONS! *notice no death defying verb there* we gave them weapons becuase Iran was being big headed and wanted to take over the whole middle east. and eventually world domination. okay so....we have a bunch of fucking morons thinking they are so much better than the world. so we send them a fruit basket and tell them go ahead try and take over the world? FUCK NO! were going to stop them! christ.....:banghead: I dont think that kids, student need to have a bias teacher of such of an extreme. Becuase now what she is doing is making this moronic students believe what she does. she is slowly breeding a bunch of liberals. becuase like many other people she leaves out the FULL story. the FULL truth about whats going on. she makes certian people look bad. certian situations. i want to hear BOTH sides and then draw upon my own conclusion. im a big girl i can do that, i can think on my own i dont need someone doing it for me.....

okay i think i feel a little bit better.

another post from an under educated loon. were did you pick up the name calling and bad grammer, back on the farm? your prof might be liberal, but i suspect she's a better person than the ignorant, foul mouth hillbilly you come across as.

well as I last read this was venting. correct me if I'm wrong there. and hillbilly? hm so I live in FL that makes me a hillbilly? too bad I just moved here from Maryland....didn't know they had hillbillies in D.C. *shrugs* and I'm a bad person, under educated? Don't speak before you know a person.

independent ftw

another post from an under educated loon. were did you pick up the name calling and bad grammer, back on the farm? your prof might be liberal, but i suspect she's a better person than the ignorant, foul mouth hillbilly you come across as.

1. Capitalization error x3
2. under-educated, but uneducated would have been a better choice
3. Where, not "were"
4. grammar, not grammer
5. foul-mouthed, not foul mouth

If you're going to make an attempt at insulting the intelligence of another person, it's usually best to make certain beforehand that you aren't a moron.

Becuase now what she is doing is making this moronic students believe what she does. she is slowly breeding a bunch of liberals. becuase like many other people she leaves out the FULL story. the FULL truth about whats going on. she makes certian people look bad. certian situations. i want to hear BOTH sides and then draw upon my own conclusion.

There are 10 kinds of people: those who like to lead and those who like to be lead. Ever heard a speech that highlighted both sides of anything? That would hardly be a speech. :rolleyes: If you want a full story, you should find something to read or someone else's views on the subject. I would consider you lucky that your professor is so obviously biased. That's far better than the professors I had, slowly feeding their ideas into young, unadultered minds. :uhoh:

i mean honestly she says that we gave weapons of "mass destrucion" to Iraq. and of course the class is like *gasp* oh noes. but what she fails to say is WHY we gave WEAPONS! *notice no death defying verb there* we gave them weapons becuase Iran was being big headed and wanted to take over the whole middle east. and eventually world domination. okay so....we have a bunch of fucking morons thinking they are so much better than the world. so we send them a fruit basket and tell them go ahead try and take over the world? FUCK NO! were going to stop them!
So, uh... you're telling me that you have a problem with the fact that your "liberal" professor told the class that our government gave weapons of mass destruction to a crazed lunatic so that he could fight a dirty war with his neighbor that would last 8 years and lead to almost a million casualities, and then, decades later, we would spend billions of dollars, thousands of young American lives, and countless civilian casualities in Iraq today in trying to retrieve these weapons because we couldnt find the jerk who was responsible for 9/11 and instead decided to go for an easier target regardless of his non-existant connection with that attack on our soil? Oh wait a second. You are pissed because your professor failed to mention the "goodness" behind all this insanity. Silly me. What your libtard professor actually told the class were these things called "facts".

By the way, this "taking over the world" stuff had me cracking up, almost as much as the "axis of evil comedy central tour".

Coming up: my rant on how I just can't stand Fox News and how I like to be told both sides of the story before I make up my own mind.

:)

So, uh... you're telling me that you have a problem with the fact that your "liberal" professor told the class that our government gave weapons of mass destruction to a crazed lunatic so that he could fight a dirty war with his neighbor that would last 8 years and lead to almost a million casualities, and then, decades later, we would spend billions of dollars, thousands of young American lives, and countless civilian casualities in Iraq today in trying to retrieve these weapons because we couldnt find the jerk who was responsible for 9/11 and instead decided to go for an easier target regardless of his non-existant connection with that attack on our soil? Oh wait a second. You are pissed because your professor failed to mention the "goodness" behind all this insanity. Silly me. What your libtard professor actually told the class were these things called "facts".

By the way, this "taking over the world" stuff had me cracking up, almost as much as the "axis of evil comedy central tour".

Coming up: my rant on how I just can't stand Fox News and how I like to be told both sides of the story before I make up my own mind.

:)

Cant wait to hear it. I will be looking forward to see it

Coming up: my rant on how I just can't stand Fox News and how I like to be told both sides of the story before I make up my own mind.


I guess I should post a rant about how I cant just can't stand the Communist News Network.

So, uh... you're telling me that you have a problem with the fact that your "liberal" professor told the class that our government gave weapons of mass destruction to a crazed lunatic so that he could fight a dirty war with his neighbor that would last 8 years and lead to almost a million casualities, and then, decades later, we would spend billions of dollars, thousands of young American lives, and countless civilian casualities in Iraq today in trying to retrieve these weapons because we couldnt find the jerk who was responsible for 9/11 and instead decided to go for an easier target regardless of his non-existant connection with that attack on our soil? Oh wait a second. You are pissed because your professor failed to mention the "goodness" behind all this insanity. Silly me. What your libtard professor actually told the class were these things called "facts".

By the way, this "taking over the world" stuff had me cracking up, almost as much as the "axis of evil comedy central tour".

Coming up: my rant on how I just can't stand Fox News and how I like to be told both sides of the story before I make up my own mind.

:)

This is just an observation and not an attack. While yes war is never a good thing sometimes it is nessecary. And while I am sure you disagree with every part of it not everyone does. That being said, I think no matter the side a fair unbiased teaching should be presented to everyone. I always had a teacher in high school who was like that. It is so easy to make war sound bad and while I disagree with some of the reasons we are at war I still think when being taught about something you should give both sides. Let the students know why we went in (without saying OIL! OIL! OIL! as that would be another way to just throw on an altered teaching). Let them know the reasons we said we were going in, all the facts (not just the numbers and bloodshead...while that is importanat too but not the sole only nessecary fact) and then let them decide for themselves. I had another teacher who was the exact opposite, very conservative and while I am a conservative I wish that he could have just laid some groundwork for us and let us make up our minds without hearing one sided facts. After a few classes with him you had the feeling in your heart that the Vietnam war was one of the most important things we have done just because he had fought in it and was very convincing in the manner in which he spoke. He would tell us about the horrible things he saw going on in there and what they did to stop it and afterwards you kind of had a mindset of being very pro-Vietnam war if you did not take the time to do more research and find out different views. Just my .02