Our Community is 940,000 Strong. Join Us.


'99 M3 Vs. '03 RSX-S


Balla5900
12-08-2004, 03:53 PM
I'm looking at either buing a 1999 BMW M3 that has about 65,000 miles on it and is in excellent condition... or a 2003 RSX-S with less than 20,000 miles. I want a car that will be reliable, fun to drive, look good and get a little respect in CAli (I'm moving there next summer)...

Thanks in advance,

Balla5900
12-08-2004, 03:56 PM
Oh, and I prob. should say that I will end up paying about 2 grand more for the M3... so it's going to be a little more of an investment.

kman10587
12-08-2004, 04:48 PM
The M3 is also gonna cost you a lot more in gas, insurance, and maintenance. That said, I think it'd be worth it to own one.

15poundhead
12-08-2004, 06:49 PM
no sport compact, even one as good as the RSX, will ever give you the satifaction of driving any bimmer, but espiecially an M3

NISSANSPDR
12-08-2004, 07:51 PM
M3 hands down and all the way

CaTasHtRoPhE 67
12-08-2004, 08:09 PM
M3 you will get more respect

DinanM3_S2
12-08-2004, 09:11 PM
Hmmm

RWD I6 or a FWD I4?
240hp vs. 200hp/210hp

If numbers alone aren't enough to convince you, go look up Car & Driver's article on "the best handling car at any price." You'll see that the E36 M3 beats out everything, including the NSX, Ferrari 355, Porsche Boxster and 911, and others. The E36 M3 can do alot more then a RSX-S can. The M3 has a nicer interior (IMO) is faster, handles better, looks better, and I just can't figure out a single way that the RSX-S is really competitive with the M. The M also has an amazing aftermarket. Test drive both, but I have a feeling that the BMW will win you over.

MexSiR
12-09-2004, 04:06 PM
M3 0-60 Mph 5.4 secs

RSX-S 0-60 Mph 6.4 secs

M3 is a lot faster, handles better, more solid...its a little bit boxy though thats the negative...

MR2Driver
12-09-2004, 04:16 PM
M3, nuff said

kman10587
12-09-2004, 04:20 PM
M3 is a lot faster, handles better, more solid...its a little bit boxy though thats the negative...

I think the boxiness is a positive; not only does it give you more interior room, it gives the car a nice understated look.

Janet Reno
12-09-2004, 08:19 PM
Are the 2001 M3's a little too high price wise? They get the sweet 333hp engine :)

I'd actually go with the RXS-S as much as I love BMW's. The only area you might consider the RSX better in is reliability and cost of keeping the car up(gas and yearly checkup stuff). And winter driving if you do that at all. It would be too hard for me to know that the M3 I bought was only a release away off of the next rendition with the 333hp engine in 2001. I don't think there was a 2000 M3.

DinanM3_S2
12-09-2004, 11:12 PM
Theres a big price difference between the E36 M3 (240hp) and the E46 M3 (333hp). The cheapest I think I've seen a non-salvage title E46 M3 was around $40,000, while the E36s usually stay under $30,000

NerveAgent
12-10-2004, 02:14 PM
m3!

YogsVR4
12-10-2004, 04:06 PM
Those two cars are not even in the same league. The RSX is a competent car but the M3 is a few steps above.













Never pay again for live sex! (http://showmewebcam.com/?p=1) | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! (http://showmewebcam.com/?p=3) | Chat for free! (http://showmewebcam.com/?p=5)

Add your comment to this topic!